On 5/4/2011 7:04 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Which documentation makes your above claims?
Both documents refer to rfc4686, albeit only in the Informative References
section. rfc4871 refers to rfc4686 only in section 8, rfc4871bis in section 8
as
well as in section 1.1.
Please provide us some pointers regarding the differences between rfc4871 and
rfc4871bis in relation to the above statement.
The claim that rfc4871bis has the goal you claim is yours.
So you need to do the work of subtantiating it.
So far, as you acknowledge, your only reference is quite old, merely
informative, and not a specification. In contrast, rfc4871bis declares the
goal
of its specification and it's not the one you assert.
You've now had multiple people responding to this thread with various
explanations why it is off the mark.
We should be done.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html