On 25 May 2011, at 02:13, John R. Levine wrote:
Interestingly enough, outlook tells me this message has been tampered
with, but not sure why...
Probably doesn't have the Comodo validation certificate.
Maybe, but my Mac does, and it complains. As does a Thunderbird client and an
Outlook client. That's three different setups that are complaining about your
signature now.
Whether they're right or wrong is largely irrelevant. The fact is that S/MIME
doesn't seem to be bullet proof.
I took the copy of my message that came back from the mailing list, ran it
through some rather violent transformations (mail to usenet and back) and the
S/MIME signature still is OK.
R's,
John
On 5/24/11 15:35 , "John R. Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> wrote:
Are there the same issues with PGP or S/Mime email?
Generally no. They're a group of MIME parts that shouldn't need to be
recoded, or even if they are, will decode to the same value.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html