On 9/12/13 12:28 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 9/12/2013 12:20 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
I will note that vanilla, uncustomized SpamAssassin does implement ADSP,
so there might be more checking of ADSP records than some realize. See,
for example:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED
There seems to be a pattern that has developed, of demanding that
failure mean literally no adoption. It doesn't mean that. It means
that it has no community traction. ADSP more than qualifies on the
pragmatics of failure.
This was a response to your statement to Barry and Pete, "It has
garnered almost no deployment and use." If that comment was relevant, so
is a comment that there is, in fact, some deployment.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html