On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
So, when the filters catch up, it will then mark it as spam again
regardless of the DKIM signature.
So what exactly is the problem here?
I suppose when the filters catch up, the spammer can no longer get
$HIGH_REPUTATION_MAIL_SERVER to sign that message until the next hole is
discovered. But everything submitted and replayed prior to that has
already gone out and been delivered on the basis of that reputation.
That's the problem here.
-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html