On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, John Levine wrote:
Yes, indeed. Here's some questions that relate to a charter that
occur to me:
How extensive is the group's goal? Spec out a signature scheme for
draft standard? Rough out the parameters but leave the details for
experimental deployment? Lay out all the options and leave it at that?
We need a more comprehensive understanding of interop issues that are
likely to make message data signatures unreliable, especially signatures
that cover the message header.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: NORTHEAST 4 OR 5 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. MAINLY FAIR. GOOD.