On Sep 29, 2004, at 8:24 PM, william(at)elan.net wrote:
And I don't think requirement document for automated
message body encryption is such a bad document to have (it does not
need
to become an RFC, but internet draft is better then nothing and I don't
think we'll be able to get all the requirements and discussions about
it
fit directly into the group charter).
And there's nothing wrong with it becoming an Informational RFC. This
is standard practice now in the IETF.
So I agree with William. Let's do a requirements doc in lockstep with
the threats analysis, then pick one of the proposals that best meets
the requirements.
-andy