On Jan 10, 2005, at 6:38 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
SPF has insurmountable technical flaws which render it unsuitable
for IETF endorsement;
With all due respect, this is only your opinion.
I wouldn't characterise the massive resistance to SPF as 'lack of
concern'. Rather, I see it as a perfectly sane resistance to
prematurely
jumping on the bandwagon and implementing a fundamentally broken
'solution' to a problem which can be addressed in other ways.
How would you characterize its "massive" acceptance compared to
everything else?
With all this talk on this list about the best being the enemy of the
good, I'd like to point out that perhaps SPF is good enough.
-andy