On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:54:44PM +0200, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
[Ned Freed]:
[Jutta Degener]:
> [editheader]
interesting, the draft says "replaceheader". "editheader" is a better
name, especially if :newname goes away.
The extension is "editheader", comprising the three commands
"addheader", "deleteheader", and "replaceheader".
addheader "Comment" ["1", "2"];
Sorry, but I'd rather stick to simple name/value pairs.
this might be an issue for the variables draft, it could say that the
search must be short-circuited (given, but perhaps not strongly enough
worded in existing documents), and the search done in first to last
order. would that be appropriate?
I'd rather leave it undefined, so that people have more freedom
in how to implement their search. If a script writer needs a
specific order, they can always force it by separating the statements.
Jutta