[Ned Freed]:
[Kjetil T Homme]:
> I do feel that keeping the header name separate is best, if only for
> consistency with deleteheader and replaceheader.
Consistency with header is actually more important IMO.
agreed, but I don't think a list of header names is very useful. the
following is the best I can come up with :-)
addheader ["Precedence", "X-Priority"] "cosmic top important";
[...] it begs the question of why deleteheader/addheader aren't
sufficient in the same way that a sequence of addheader actions is
sufficient to avoid the use of lists in addheader.
the only point I can see in favour of keeping replaceheader, is
Nigel's (general) point on idioms for GUIs. and it doesn't seem very
compelling here.
--
Kjetil T.