|
Re: draft-elvey-refuse-sieve-02.txt; http://wiki.fastmail.fm/wiki/index.php/SieveExtensionsSupportMatrix
2004-08-10 12:09:33
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
There was some discussion at the lunch BOF last week about the utility
of refuse. There was general consensus among the participants that it
would be better to extend reject to allow for SMTP refusal and DSN
generation rather than add a new command. Personally I prefer that
approach - but the issue needs more discussion on the list.
We've probably been over this before, but can you explain in detail
why you think a new command is better than extending the behaviour of
reject?
I personally don't care, this is just syntax. I think somebody has
objected to this before.
Alexey
|
|