ietf-mta-filters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: -01 revision of proposed sieve WG charter

2004-10-01 10:00:29

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:13:41PM -0700, 
ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:

(2) Produce updated sieve relational (RFC 3431), subaddress (RFC 3598),
    spamtest/virustest (RFC 3685), and copy extension specifications,

The "copy extensions specifications" being "draft-degener-sieve-copy" ?
Why is it listed in (2) and not in (3)?  (not that it really matters I
guess, just wanted to make sure it's included...)

Also the "draft-daboo-sieve-include" draft is not mentioned (which is OK
with me -- I didn't care for the include draft the way it was but think
that some kind of include facility is important).  I'm assuming it's
left out because of the lack of "willingness to implement" that you
said later, but again, just pointing out that it's not there.

My only other comment is about the rapid schedule on the variables
draft- I had some thoughts that would probably not be appropriate if the
draft is to be sent through at this rate.

-mm-