On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:47:28PM -0400, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi Mark,
--On Friday, October 1, 2004 1:00 PM -0400 "Mark E. Mallett"
<mem(_at_)mv(_dot_)mv(_dot_)com> wrote:
(2) Produce updated sieve relational (RFC 3431), subaddress (RFC 3598),
spamtest/virustest (RFC 3685), and copy extension specifications,
The "copy extensions specifications" being "draft-degener-sieve-copy" ?
Why is it listed in (2) and not in (3)? (not that it really matters I
guess, just wanted to make sure it's included...)
That draft is currently in the RFC Editor queue waiting to be published,
and hopefully will be very soon - so it is correct to put it under (2)
thought there is no RFC number assigned to it right now.
Ah... thanks. Saw the notice yesterday, in fact: RFC3894
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3894.txt
mm