On Fri, Oct 00, 2004 at 01:00:28PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:13:41PM -0700,
ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
(2) Produce updated sieve relational (RFC 3431), subaddress (RFC 3598),
spamtest/virustest (RFC 3685), and copy extension specifications,
The "copy extensions specifications" being "draft-degener-sieve-copy" ?
Why is it listed in (2) and not in (3)? (not that it really matters I
guess, just wanted to make sure it's included...)
By the time Ned's document is published,
the copy extension is very likely to have become an RFC.
Jutta