ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com sent forth electrons to *convey (among other
things) an interesting point*:
...
I really don't want to do anything that has the potential to make
reject more
popular than it already is.
Ok, I think you have a valid argument here. Why cause trouble enhancing
something we're trying to render as obsolete and rarely used as possible?
Ok, so we'll leave reject as is, and refuse as is? (the latter works
with "reject" and "discard", but the former doesn't.)
Shall we see if anyone objects to that? I'd think Nigel would be happy
to use "refuse" with "reject" and/or "discard" instead of "reject".
/me prepares to head back to undo draft changes....
--
Have a nice week-end, folks!