Re: Change to "reject" action: compatible with fileinto/redirect?2005-04-29 17:32:58Shall we see if anyone objects to that? I'd think Nigel would be happy to use "refuse" with "reject" and/or "discard" instead of "reject". Yes, the use case that I did describe really was more suited to refuse + redirect or fileinto rather than reject. I had our server scripts in mind where "reject" operates as "refuse", so sorry if I caused extra confusion :o) Nigel
|
|