Re: values of notify ":priority" tag

On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 17:26 +0100, Michael Haardt wrote:
> Note I just changed my mind and now support keeping ":priority"
> (Barry suggested to rename it to ":importance") in the generic
> framework.
I was just going to suggest ":urgency" to get the idea more clearly
across when the message from Peter Saint-Andre ticked in :-)

(important things aren't always urgent.)
-- 
Kjetil T.