[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3028bis, section 4.2, paragraph 2

2007-02-07 14:04:50

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:26:16PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:

it would instead say:

   The message is send back out with the address from the redirect
   command as an envelope recipient.  Implementations MAY combine
   separate redirects for a given message into a single submission with
   multiple envelope recipients.  (This is not an MUA-style forward,
   which creates a new message with a different sender and message ID,
   wrapping the old message in a new one.)

And yes, the elimination of the mention of .forward files in intentional, 
as that irked some.


Are there any objections to the above change?

Only that you should replace "send" with "sent" ("The message is sent...").
Otherwise fine.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>