[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3028bis, section 4.2, paragraph 2

2007-02-07 09:28:45

Philip Guenther writes:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Fine. A 'for' clause is desirable, but I suppose it always is.

IMHO, if the discussion in RFC 2821 of 'for' clauses and when they should or should not be included (c.f. sections 4.4, 7.2, and 7.5) is insufficient, then it should be fixed there and not in 3028bis.

I could argue that one either way... so let's just use the text you proposed earlier today.