Re: 3028bis, section 4.2, paragraph 2

Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> So it sounds like you are saying that the new text about how the count
> of Received headers MUST be larger is connected to that.  That since
> some implementations may choose to count Received lines to avoid loops,
> all implementations must have a higher Received line count when doing
> redirect.
If two (or more) implementations are configured to loop, just one adds 
Received headers and uses them for loop control, that's enough to stop 
the loop.
I can't imagine why anyone wouldn't add Received anyway, just based on 
advice in 2821 (and common sense).
Tim