On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 19:12 +0000, Aaron Stone wrote:
Note that LWSP is optional by definition,
ouch, good catch!
very.
LWSP requires WSP after CRLF, too, so it's simply not what we want, we
need to add another basic terminal, perhaps
blank = WSP / CRLF
I suggest we stick to the poll question from Alexey, but with "1*blank"
replacing LWSP in his suggested new text.
That looks right (name doesn't have to be "blank" but whatever).
I concur that comments should not be allowed.
ditto
mm