On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 20:15 +0100, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
And add the following paragraph to the end of the section:
The following examples demonstrate valid and invalid encodings
and how they are handled:
the list is quite long, I feel we can demonstrate more than one issue in
each example.
"$${hex:40}" -> "$@"
"${hex: 40 }" -> "@"
"${HEX: 40}" -> "@"
the second is superfluous.
"${hex:40" -> "${hex:40"
"${hex:400}" -> "${hex:400}"
these are good.
"${hex:40${hex:40}}" -> "${hex:40(_at_)}"
"${hex:40${hex:30}}" -> "${hex:400}"
would demonstrate that only one pass is done, too.
"${unicode:40}" -> "@"
"${ unicode:40}" -> "${ unicode:40}"
"${UNICODE:40}" -> "@"
if we include the last example, the first in this set is superfluous
IMHO. I'd like one of the examples to include backslash quoting, we
could extend that example, e.g., "\${UNICODE:40}" -> "@"
"${UnICoDE:0000040}" -> "@"
fine.
"${Unicode:40}" -> "@"
unnecessary, IMHO.
"${Unicode:Cool}" -> "${Unicode:Cool}"
"${unicode:1000000}" -> error
"${unicode:200000}" -> error
"${Unicode:DF01} -> error
ok.
And I've missed Michael's favorite:
"${hex:" -> "${hex:"
I think the fourth example from the top covers this already, that is
"${hex:40".
--
Kjetil T.