Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Key word "policy description". This group is concerned with a
very small
goal - authorization records for MTAs or in your own words
"listing out
the edge mail servers". We are not making generic policy exchange
mechanisms - if you want to make those, then we need to restate the
problem and evaluate it from that angle. Otherwise, you will end up
overloading MARID for the purposes it was not intended to be.
The charter does not limit the scope to envelope from or to data
from. It seems strange to argue that therefore we have to pick one
and only one.
You are right, I assumed that you are looking at MARID as a generic
policy mechanism. I have no problems with ability to indicate multiple
identities being in there, as long as it does not devolve into a generic
mechanism.
Allowing an ability for the sender to indicate a specific identity might
be one possible solution. I would rather see such ability if put in, to
be normative, rather than non-normative.
Yakov