Difference between MSA and MTA per RFC2476, Greg Connor, 2004/03/30

• Re: Difference between MSA and MTA per RFC2476, Andrew Newton, 2004/03/30

Limited scope of work, Andrew Newton, 2004/03/29

• Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 2004/03/29
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Andrew Newton, 2004/03/29
    • Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 2004/03/30
    • Re: Limited scope of work, Andrew Newton, 2004/03/30
• Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 2004/03/29
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/29
• Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 2004/03/30
• Re: Limited scope of work, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 2004/03/31
    • Re: Limited scope of work, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
• RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 2004/03/30
• Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Marshall Rose, 2004/03/30
    • Charter as proposed to IESG, John Leslie, 2004/03/31
• RE: Limited scope of work, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, wayne, 2004/03/30
    • Re: Limited scope of work, Greg Connor, 2004/03/30
    • Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 2004/03/30
• RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/30
• RE: Limited scope of work, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/30
• RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/30
  • Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 2004/03/30
• RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/31

Different identities for different problems?, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/28

• Re: Different identities for different problems?, wayne, 2004/03/28
  • Re: Different identities for different problems?, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/28
    • Re: Different identities for different problems?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/03/28
• RE: Different identities for different problems?, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/29
  • RE: Different identities for different problems?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/03/29
    • Re: Different identities for different problems?, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
• RE: Different identities for different problems?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/29
• RE: Different identities for different problems?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/29

Let senders pick identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/27

• Re: Let senders pick identities, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/28
• Re: Let senders pick identities, Hector Santos, 2004/03/28

Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27

• Re: Ruminations, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/27
  • Re: Ruminations, Philip Miller, 2004/03/27
• Re: Ruminations, Hector Santos, 2004/03/27
• Re: Ruminations, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/28
  • Re: Ruminations, Greg Connor, 2004/03/28
• RE: Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27
  • Re: Ruminations, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/27
    • Re: Ruminations, wayne, 2004/03/29
• RE: Ruminations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/27
• RE: Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/28
• RE: Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/29
• RE: Ruminations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/29
  • Re: Ruminations, wayne, 2004/03/30

plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Marshall Rose, 2004/03/26

• Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/26
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Marshall Rose, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Pete Resnick, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Pete Resnick, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hector Santos, 2004/03/27
• Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Philip Miller, 2004/03/26
• Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 2004/03/26
• Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Aredridel, 2004/03/27
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 2004/03/27
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Aredridel, 2004/03/27
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 2004/03/27
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Aredridel, 2004/03/28
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 2004/03/30
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hector Santos, 2004/03/31
• Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., wayne, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 2004/03/30
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hector Santos, 2004/03/31
• Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Greg Connor, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., wayne, 2004/03/28
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/26
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Marshall Rose, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Philip Miller, 2004/03/26
    • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Dave Crocker, 2004/03/28
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/26
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/26
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/26
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 2004/03/30
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/27
• Re: RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/27
• RE: RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/27
  • Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/27
• RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/29

Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, bz, 2004/03/24

• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Philip Miller, 2004/03/24
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Aredridel, 2004/03/24
• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Matt Sergeant, 2004/03/26
• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, bz, 2004/03/26
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Matt Sergeant, 2004/03/26
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/26

RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/24

• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Philip Miller, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/26
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/26
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/26
• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/24
• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Aredridel, 2004/03/24
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/25
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/25
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/25
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/25
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/26
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/26
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/26
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/29
• Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Marshall Rose, 2004/03/31
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/31
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark Baugher, 2004/03/31
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/31
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/31
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/31
• RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/31

definition of joe job and phishing, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/23

• Re: definition of joe job and phishing, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/23

Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, John Leslie, 2004/03/22

• Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/22
  • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Hector Santos, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, John Leslie, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, ned . freed, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/23
• Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/23
  • Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, ned . freed, 2004/03/23
• Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/24

RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/21

• RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/21
  • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/22
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/22
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/22
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/22
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Greg Connor, 2004/03/22
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Edwin Aoki, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, John Leslie, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/23
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/26
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/28
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, ned . freed, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, wayne, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, wayne, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, wayne, 2004/03/25
• Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/22
  • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, John Leslie, 2004/03/22
• RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/22
• RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/25

reminder: text conferencing, Marshall Rose, 2004/03/20

• Re: reminder: text conferencing, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/20

Choice of identities: compromise?, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/20

• Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/20
• Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, wayne, 2004/03/20
• Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/20
  • Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Aredridel, 2004/03/22
• Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Hector Santos, 2004/03/21
• RE: Choice of identities: compromise?, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/20

Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Hector Santos, 2004/03/20

• Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Philip Miller, 2004/03/20
  • Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Hector Santos, 2004/03/20
    • Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/20
    • Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Hector Santos, 2004/03/21
    • Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Philip Miller, 2004/03/21

[overloading TXT again?] RE: when spoofing isn't, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/20

• Re: [overloading TXT again?] RE: when spoofing isn't, wayne, 2004/03/20

When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19

• Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
  • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/19
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
    • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/19
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
    • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
• Re: When spoofing is., Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
  • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
• Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 2004/03/19
• RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19
  • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
  • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/19
• RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19
• RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/20
• RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/20
  • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Alan DeKok, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Dave Crocker, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Alan DeKok, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Alan DeKok, 2004/03/21
• RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/21
  • Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/21
  • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Greg Connor, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 2004/03/21
    • Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/21
• RE: When spoofing is., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/21

RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19

• Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
• RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19
  • Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
  • Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
• RE: when spoofing isn't, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/19
  • Re: when spoofing isn't, Matthew Elvey, 2004/03/23
• RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19
  • Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
• RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19
• RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/19
  • Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19

RE: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs cry pto signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/18

• Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs cry pto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18

sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18

• Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
• Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
  • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, wayne, 2004/03/18
• Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, wayne, 2004/03/18
• Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
  • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
  • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
    • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/18
    • preserving desired functionality at the cost of changing implementations, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
    • when spoofing isn't, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/18
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor, 2004/03/19
    • Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/19
    • Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/21
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Greg Connor, 2004/03/21
    • Message not available
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/21
    • Re: Choice of SMTP headers, John Leslie, 2004/03/22
• Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/18
  • Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18

Another tweak to eliminate objections - SRV records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/18

• Re: Another tweak to eliminate objections - SRV records, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/18

RE: onus on mailing lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/18

• Re: onus on mailing lists, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
  • Re: onus on mailing lists, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/18
    • Re: onus on mailing lists, Philip Miller, 2004/03/18
    • Re: onus on mailing lists, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/18
• Re: onus on mailing lists, wayne, 2004/03/18

Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17

• Re: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Jeremy T. Bouse, 2004/03/17
  • onus on mailing lists, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/18
• Re: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
• RE: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17

RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17

• Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/17
    • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/18
    • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
    • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/18
    • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/18
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/18

Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17

• Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, John Leslie, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Jeremy T. Bouse, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, John Leslie, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17
• RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17

Speaking of Propaganda..., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17

• RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
  • RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Paul Hoffman / IMC, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Speaking of Propaganda..., wayne, 2004/03/17
• RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
• RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/17
  • Re: Speaking of Propaganda..., wayne, 2004/03/17

On the interpretation question., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16

• Re: On the interpretation question., wayne, 2004/03/16

DRAFT charter, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/15

• Re: DRAFT charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/15
• Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, wayne, 2004/03/18
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/18
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, wayne, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Aredridel, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/24
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/25
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/25
  • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/19
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/28
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/29
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/29
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/29
    • Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/31
• RE: DRAFT charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/15
  • Re: DRAFT charter, Hector Santos, 2004/03/15
• re: Draft Charter, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/16
  • Re: Draft Charter, wayne, 2004/03/16
    • Re: Draft Charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/16
  • Message not available
    • Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/17
• RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
  • Re: Draft Charter, John Leslie, 2004/03/16
  • RE: Draft Charter, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/16
• Re: RE: Draft Charter, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/16
• RE: RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
• RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
  • Re: Draft Charter, wayne, 2004/03/16
• RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
  • Re: Draft Charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/16
• RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
• RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
• RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/16
  • Re: Draft Charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/16
• RE: Draft Charter, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/17

Comedy vs Hysteria, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/13

• Re: Comedy vs Hysteria, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/14

Real work items (Was: DNS etc.), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/12

• Re: Real work items (Was: DNS etc.), Hector Santos, 2004/03/12
• RE: Real work items (Was: DNS etc.), Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/12

RE: authentication or authorization?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11

• Re: authentication or authorization?, Hector Santos, 2004/03/11

Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/11

• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
  • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Edwin Aoki, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/11
    • Message not available
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 2004/03/11
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
  • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/11
  • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, John Leslie, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, ned . freed, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, ned . freed, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, John Leslie, 2004/03/12
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/12
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, ned . freed, 2004/03/12
    • control of the DNS zone vs control of the email system, wayne, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/12
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/12
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
  • RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/12
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
  • RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/12
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/12
  • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/12
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/12
• RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/13
  • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/13
  • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 2004/03/13
    • Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 2004/03/13

Re: Three major areas of concentration, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/11

• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/12
  • Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/13
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/13
  • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/15
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/13
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/13
  • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/13
  • Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/13
  • Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/13
  • RE: Three major areas of concentration, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/13
  • Re: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/14
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/13
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/13
• RE: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/14
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/14
  • RE: Three major areas of concentration, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/15
• RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/14
  • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/14
    • mail flows diagram, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/15
• Re: RE: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/15
• RE: RE: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/15

Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/10

• Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/10
  • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, John Levine, 2004/03/11
  • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Ólafur Guðmundsson, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/11
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
  • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, wayne, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hector Santos, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, wayne, 2004/03/11
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
• Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/11
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/11
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/12
  • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/12
    • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/12
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/12
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/12
  • RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/12
• RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/12
  • Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/13

Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 2004/03/10

• RE: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/10
  • Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 2004/03/10
• RE: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/10
  • Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, John Levine, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 2004/03/10
  • Some thoughts on the costs of Block vs Factored queries, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/10

[Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/10

• RE: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/10
  • Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Edwin Aoki, 2004/03/10
    • Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/10
    • authentication or authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/11
    • Re: authentication or authorization?, Hector Santos, 2004/03/11
    • Re: authentication or authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/11
    • Re: authentication or authorization?, wayne, 2004/03/11
    • Re: authentication or authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, ned . freed, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, ned . freed, 2004/03/10
    • Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hector Santos, 2004/03/10
    • Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 2004/03/10
• RE: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/10
• RE: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/10

Input documents vs. work items., Ted Hardie, 2004/03/10

• Re: Input documents vs. work items., Ted Hardie, 2004/03/10

Re: What semantics are conveyed, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/10

• Re: What semantics are conveyed, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/10

LMAP Validation Analysis, Hector Santos, 2004/03/09

• Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Hector Santos, 2004/03/09
  • Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Philip Miller, 2004/03/10
    • Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Hector Santos, 2004/03/10
    • Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/10

Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/08

• Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/09
• Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Ted Hardie, 2004/03/09
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/09
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Edwin Aoki, 2004/03/09
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/09
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/09
    • Message not available
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/09
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/09
  • What semantics are conveyed (was Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet? ), Alan DeKok, 2004/03/09
    • Re: What semantics are conveyed, wayne, 2004/03/09
    • Re: What semantics are conveyed, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/09
    • Re: What semantics are conveyed, wayne, 2004/03/10
    • Re: What semantics are conveyed, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/10
    • Re: What semantics are conveyed, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/10
    • Re: What semantics are conveyed, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/10
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, wayne, 2004/03/09
    • Re: Not ignoring previous research, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/09
    • Three major areas of concentration, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/10
• RE: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/09
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/09
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Edwin Aoki, 2004/03/09
• RE: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/09
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/09
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/09
• RE: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/09
  • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/10
    • Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Philip Miller, 2004/03/10
    • Economics & deployment (was Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet? ), Alan DeKok, 2004/03/11
    • Re: Economics & deployment, wayne, 2004/03/15
    • Re: Economics & deployment, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/15
    • Re: Economics & deployment, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/16

another protocol like sip, fujiwara, 2004/03/06

• Re: another protocol like sip, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/06
• Re: another protocol like sip, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/06

[Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/05

• RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/05
  • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/05
• RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/05

Giving it some structure, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/04

• Re: Giving it some structure, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/04

Simple Policy Control Protocol, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/04

• Re: Simple Policy Control Protocol, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/04
  • Re: Simple Policy Control Protocol, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/04

Preliminary minutes from the meeting this morning, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/03

• Some slides from the meeting this morning, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/03/04
  • Re: Some slides from the meeting this morning, Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/04

MBONE access?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/03

• Message not available
  • Re: MBONE access?, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/03
    • Re: MBONE access?, ned . freed, 2004/03/03
• RE: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/03
  • RE: MBONE access?, Jeroen Massar, 2004/03/03
• RE: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/03
• FW: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/03

Deficiencies in LMAP, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/03

• RE: Deficiencies in LMAP, Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/03
  • Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Philip Miller, 2004/03/03
  • Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/04
  • Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Alan DeKok, 2004/03/04
• RE: Deficiencies in LMAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/04
  • Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/04
  • Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Markus Stumpf, 2004/03/04
• RE: Deficiencies in LMAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/04

Principles of Spam Abatement, John Leslie, 2004/03/03

• Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/03/03
  • Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, John Leslie, 2004/03/03
• Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/03
  • Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, John Leslie, 2004/03/03
    • Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/03

Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/02

• Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/03
• Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Jon Kyme, 2004/03/04
  • Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich, 2004/03/04
    • Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Dave Crocker, 2004/03/10

RE: we made CNN...., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/01

• RE: we made CNN...., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/01
  • Re: we made CNN...., Steven M. Bellovin, 2004/03/01
    • Re: we made CNN...., Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/01
• RE: we made CNN...., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/01
• RE: we made CNN...., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/03/01
  • Re: we made CNN...., Patrik Fältström, 2004/03/01
• RE: we made CNN...., Gordon Fecyk, 2004/03/01