Re: when spoofing isn't


On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:18:45PM -0800, Greg Connor wrote:


Most important: Ability to easily specify outgoing servers and refute others


I'd modify that to say: "Ability to easily specify an arbitrary number
of outgoing servers and/or refute others."

Even so, there's an issue with the maximum length of TXT records (255
chars, after which BIND seems to split the record), and the arbitrary
returned order of multiple TXT records.

-- 
Mark C. Langston                                    Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org                                       
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin                                SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org                               http://www.seti.org

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: when spoofing isn't, (continued) Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich RE: when spoofing isn't, Gordon Fecyk Re: when spoofing isn't, Matthew Elvey RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston <=

Previous by Date:	Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor
Next by Date:	Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston
Previous by Thread:	Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor
Next by Thread:	When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]