IETF MARID (date)
March 31, 2004
- Re: Limited scope of work, Yakov Shafranovich, 22:01
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 21:44
- Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 21:20
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark Baugher, 17:45
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 15:39
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 15:29
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 15:02
- Re: Different identities for different problems?, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:54
- Re: Limited scope of work, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:51
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:41
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:39
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 13:13
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:41
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 12:11
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:55
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 11:06
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:13
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 08:39
- Charter as proposed to IESG, John Leslie, 08:36
- RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:07
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Marshall Rose, 04:39
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hector Santos, 02:01
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 01:59
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hector Santos, 01:48
March 30, 2004
- Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 23:51
- Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 23:31
- Re: Limited scope of work, Greg Connor, 23:08
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 22:30
- Re: Difference between MSA and MTA per RFC2476, Andrew Newton, 21:58
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 21:56
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 21:56
- Re: Limited scope of work, Marshall Rose, 21:54
- Re: Ruminations, wayne, 21:18
- Re: Limited scope of work, wayne, 21:18
- RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:53
- RE: Limited scope of work, Gordon Fecyk, 18:19
- Re: Limited scope of work, Mark C. Langston, 17:25
- Difference between MSA and MTA per RFC2476, Greg Connor, 17:22
- Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 17:21
- Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 17:18
- RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:03
- Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 16:31
- Re: Limited scope of work, Mark C. Langston, 15:01
- Re: Limited scope of work, Hector Santos, 14:50
- RE: Limited scope of work, Gordon Fecyk, 14:02
- Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 13:07
- Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 12:17
- RE: Limited scope of work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:35
- Re: Limited scope of work, Andrew Newton, 06:29
- Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 04:51
March 29, 2004
- Re: Limited scope of work, Mark C. Langston, 16:17
- Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 16:07
- Re: Limited scope of work, Andrew Newton, 15:57
- Re: Limited scope of work, John Leslie, 15:31
- RE: Different identities for different problems?, william(at)elan.net, 14:01
- RE: Ruminations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:53
- RE: Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 12:52
- Limited scope of work, Andrew Newton, 12:27
- RE: Different identities for different problems?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:24
- Re: Ruminations, wayne, 11:22
- RE: Different identities for different problems?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:39
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:22
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 07:40
- RE: Different identities for different problems?, Gordon Fecyk, 07:27
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 02:07
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 00:48
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 00:37
March 28, 2004
- Re: Different identities for different problems?, william(at)elan.net, 20:24
- Re: Different identities for different problems?, Yakov Shafranovich, 19:40
- RE: Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 19:34
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Aredridel, 18:34
- Re: Different identities for different problems?, wayne, 16:57
- Different identities for different problems?, Yakov Shafranovich, 15:38
- Re: Ruminations, Greg Connor, 15:32
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 13:54
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., wayne, 12:15
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 09:52
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Dave Crocker, 09:35
- Re: Ruminations, Dave Crocker, 09:35
- Re: Let senders pick identities, Hector Santos, 03:32
- Re: Let senders pick identities, Jon Kyme, 01:40
March 27, 2004
- Re: Ruminations, Markus Stumpf, 20:53
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Greg Connor, 19:32
- Let senders pick identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 19:23
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., wayne, 19:10
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 19:03
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 18:17
- RE: Ruminations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:37
- RE: RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:35
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 16:05
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 15:32
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 15:18
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Aredridel, 14:56
- Re: Ruminations, Philip Miller, 14:55
- RE: Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 14:36
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 13:58
- Re: RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 13:50
- Re: Ruminations, Hector Santos, 13:40
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:18
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:09
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 13:04
- Re: Ruminations, Mark C. Langston, 13:02
- Ruminations, Gordon Fecyk, 12:50
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 12:26
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Aredridel, 11:48
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:48
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 10:17
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 09:06
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hector Santos, 05:39
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Jon Kyme, 03:31
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 00:00
March 26, 2004
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Matthew Elvey, 20:42
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Philip Miller, 20:10
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Philip Miller, 19:56
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 18:14
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Marshall Rose, 18:02
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Mark C. Langston, 17:54
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Gordon Fecyk, 17:18
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Pete Resnick, 15:05
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 15:00
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 14:54
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Pete Resnick, 14:45
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 14:45
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Marshall Rose, 14:21
- RE: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:19
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 12:59
- Re: plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Yakov Shafranovich, 12:51
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 12:33
- Motion for closure? RE: Why we should, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:22
- plan for april 5th xmpp conference..., Marshall Rose, 12:16
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:49
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 11:31
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:04
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Matt Sergeant, 06:24
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, bz, 06:12
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Matt Sergeant, 03:42
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 01:33
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 01:29
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 00:15
March 25, 2004
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 22:35
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 20:13
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 15:41
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 12:48
- RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:35
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 11:07
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 10:25
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:14
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Patrik Fältström, 09:55
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Alan DeKok, 09:01
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 08:51
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, wayne, 08:48
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 02:31
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 01:36
March 24, 2004
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Aredridel, 23:04
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Aredridel, 20:45
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, Philip Miller, 20:04
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO, bz, 19:26
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Philip Miller, 19:03
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Mark C. Langston, 17:14
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 17:10
- RE: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Gordon Fecyk, 16:55
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 16:37
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Aredridel, 16:23
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 14:18
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 14:08
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 13:48
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 13:45
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, wayne, 13:16
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 12:15
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, wayne, 11:25
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 10:54
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, ned . freed, 10:27
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, wayne, 10:04
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 10:03
- fyi; MARID video bittorrents are going away, wayne, 09:58
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 09:20
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Dave Crocker, 08:58
- WG Review: MTA Authorization Records in DNS (marid), The IESG, 08:18
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 08:17
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 07:54
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 02:04
March 23, 2004
- LMAP scenarios. Correction. Paging DeKok, Levine. How to authenticate header From: !?, Matthew Elvey, 22:29
- greeting card sites not a problem for LMAP, Matthew Elvey, 21:08
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 21:00
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, John Leslie, 18:15
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Mark C. Langston, 17:44
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Dave Crocker, 17:20
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, John Leslie, 14:57
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, ned . freed, 14:25
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 13:42
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Edwin Aoki, 13:30
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 13:14
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 12:16
- Re: definition of joe job and phishing, Mark C. Langston, 11:53
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Mark C. Langston, 11:50
- definition of joe job and phishing, Dave Crocker, 11:35
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, ned . freed, 11:25
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 09:08
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Matthew Elvey, 08:23
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Alan DeKok, 07:55
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Hector Santos, 06:50
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 03:52
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Dave Crocker, 01:52
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Jon Kyme, 01:30
March 22, 2004
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Greg Connor, 22:17
- Re: Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, Dave Crocker, 17:52
- Intermediate MTA setting MAIL-From, John Leslie, 16:07
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 12:47
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 12:29
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 11:44
- Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Aredridel, 11:26
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Alan DeKok, 10:17
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, John Leslie, 07:31
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, John Leslie, 06:57
- RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:56
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Jon Kyme, 03:55
March 21, 2004
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 21:56
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 21:24
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Mark C. Langston, 21:09
- RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:59
- RE: Choice of SMTP headers, Gordon Fecyk, 19:34
- Re: Choice of SMTP headers, Greg Connor, 19:13
- Choice of SMTP headers, Dave Crocker, 17:06
- Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Philip Miller, 16:14
- RE: When spoofing is., Gordon Fecyk, 15:39
- Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 14:30
- Re: When spoofing is., Greg Connor, 13:46
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 12:56
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:44
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 12:27
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 12:24
- Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 11:32
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 10:47
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 10:38
- Re: When spoofing is., Alan DeKok, 10:37
- Re: When spoofing is., Alan DeKok, 10:34
- Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 10:20
- Re: When spoofing is., Dave Crocker, 09:53
- Re: When spoofing is., Alan DeKok, 08:02
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:27
- RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:22
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:28
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:24
- Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Hector Santos, 01:03
- Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Hector Santos, 00:12
March 20, 2004
- Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Yakov Shafranovich, 23:48
- Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Hector Santos, 23:17
- Re: reminder: text conferencing, Mark C. Langston, 22:18
- reminder: text conferencing, Marshall Rose, 22:07
- Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Dave Crocker, 21:45
- RE: Choice of identities: compromise?, Gordon Fecyk, 19:30
- Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, wayne, 19:19
- Re: Choice of identities: compromise?, Mark C. Langston, 18:38
- Choice of identities: compromise?, Yakov Shafranovich, 18:32
- Re: Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Philip Miller, 17:57
- Re: [overloading TXT again?] RE: when spoofing isn't, wayne, 12:40
- [more like "when spoofing is judged by a double standard"] RE: When spoofing is., Gordon Fecyk, 11:06
- Top Concerns, Issues, Comments, Hector Santos, 10:56
- [overloading TXT again?] RE: when spoofing isn't, Gordon Fecyk, 10:52
- RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:55
- RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:50
March 19, 2004
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 21:22
- RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:27
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:12
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:09
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 18:06
- RE: When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:38
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 16:49
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 16:47
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor, 16:19
- Re: When spoofing is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:15
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:53
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:44
- RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:41
- RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:36
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor, 14:08
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 13:18
- Re: When spoofing is., wayne, 13:18
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Greg Connor, 13:07
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 12:51
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 12:47
- RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:34
- Re: When spoofing is., Yakov Shafranovich, 12:28
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 12:22
- Re: When spoofing is., Mark C. Langston, 11:58
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 11:37
- RE: when spoofing isn't, Gordon Fecyk, 11:37
- When spoofing is., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:25
- RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:03
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Dave Crocker, 10:53
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 10:46
- RE: when spoofing isn't, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:31
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 10:01
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Yakov Shafranovich, 09:49
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 09:25
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Jon Kyme, 02:10
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Dave Crocker, 01:05
March 18, 2004
- Re: Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, Yakov Shafranovich, 22:12
- Re: when spoofing isn't, Mark C. Langston, 22:01
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Mark C. Langston, 21:36
- Why we should choose the RFC2821 MAIL FROM/HELO identities, wayne, 21:30
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Yakov Shafranovich, 21:27
- when spoofing isn't, Dave Crocker, 20:27
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 20:20
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 20:19
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Mark C. Langston, 20:04
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Yakov Shafranovich, 19:38
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs cry pto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 19:11
- RE: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs cry pto signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:07
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 18:38
- preserving desired functionality at the cost of changing implementations, Meng Weng Wong, 18:22
- Re: onus on mailing lists, Markus Stumpf, 17:30
- Re: onus on mailing lists, Philip Miller, 16:25
- Draft charter to be sent for public review, Ted Hardie, 16:03
- Re: onus on mailing lists, Markus Stumpf, 15:09
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 13:46
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 12:07
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Alan DeKok, 11:42
- MARID WG List Etiquette (Modified by Andrew Newton), Andrew Newton, 11:19
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Mark C. Langston, 11:13
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 10:51
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 10:38
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 09:29
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 09:20
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 09:12
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Alan DeKok, 09:03
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 09:01
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 08:57
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 08:50
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, wayne, 08:36
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 08:36
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Jon Kyme, 08:34
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, wayne, 08:33
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Dave Crocker, 08:24
- Re: onus on mailing lists, wayne, 08:07
- Re: sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 08:00
- Re: Another tweak to eliminate objections - SRV records, Hadmut Danisch, 07:57
- Re: onus on mailing lists, Meng Weng Wong, 07:50
- sender vs author, channel vs object, designated sender vs crypto signatures, Meng Weng Wong, 07:46
- Another tweak to eliminate objections - SRV records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:35
- RE: onus on mailing lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:11
- onus on mailing lists, Meng Weng Wong, 05:23
- Re: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Yakov Shafranovich, 01:14
- Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Yakov Shafranovich, 01:12
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Yakov Shafranovich, 00:48
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Yakov Shafranovich, 00:47
March 17, 2004
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:25
- RE: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 21:09
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 21:08
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:58
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 20:58
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 20:55
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 20:47
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Gordon Fecyk, 20:42
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:52
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:21
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:20
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 18:52
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:53
- RE: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:43
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 17:00
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:33
- Re: Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Jeremy T. Bouse, 16:22
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 16:10
- Re: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 15:59
- Proof of Consent NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:29
- Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, John Leslie, 12:36
- Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Jeremy T. Bouse, 12:31
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:04
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 11:42
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:13
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:41
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 10:27
- Re: Accreditation NON-Proposal, John Leslie, 10:23
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:50
- RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal, Gordon Fecyk, 09:37
- Re: Speaking of Propaganda..., wayne, 09:36
- RE: Draft Charter milestone sequence, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:31
- RE: Draft Charter, Gordon Fecyk, 09:30
- RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:25
- Re: Speaking of Propaganda..., wayne, 09:20
- RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:15
- RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Paul Hoffman / IMC, 09:08
- RE: Speaking of Propaganda..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:50
- Draft Charter milestone sequence, Dave Crocker, 08:43
- Accreditation NON-Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:41
- Speaking of Propaganda..., Gordon Fecyk, 08:33
March 16, 2004
- Re: Economics & deployment, Alan DeKok, 21:21
- Re: Draft Charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 20:32
- RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:24
- Re: On the interpretation question., wayne, 20:00
- Re: Draft Charter, wayne, 20:00
- RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:03
- RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:56
- RE: Draft Charter, Ted Hardie, 14:55
- Re: Draft Charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:48
- RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:41
- Re: Draft Charter, John Leslie, 14:40
- RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:36
- Re: Draft Charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 14:02
- Re: Draft Charter, wayne, 13:54
- RE: RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:51
- Re: RE: Draft Charter, Jon Kyme, 13:39
- RE: Draft Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:21
- re: Draft Charter, Ted Hardie, 12:13
- On the interpretation question., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:37
March 15, 2004
- Re: Economics & deployment, Alan DeKok, 20:32
- Re: DRAFT charter, Hector Santos, 19:34
- Re: Economics & deployment, wayne, 19:17
- RE: DRAFT charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:04
- Re: DRAFT charter, Yakov Shafranovich, 16:45
- DRAFT charter, Ted Hardie, 16:13
- RE: RE: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:37
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Ted Hardie, 09:58
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 09:52
- mail flows diagram, Meng Weng Wong, 06:39
- Re: RE: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Jon Kyme, 02:10
March 14, 2004
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Yakov Shafranovich, 20:19
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 20:04
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:20
- RE: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:14
- This looks familiar..., Gordon Fecyk, 08:06
- Re: Comedy vs Hysteria, Hadmut Danisch, 03:15
- Re: RE: Three major areas of concentration, Jon Kyme, 03:03
March 13, 2004
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Yakov Shafranovich, 18:44
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Ted Hardie, 17:15
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:59
- Comedy vs Hysteria, Gordon Fecyk, 16:30
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 15:41
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 11:38
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 11:30
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 11:18
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 11:15
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 11:00
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 10:55
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:42
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:24
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 09:14
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:58
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 05:16
March 12, 2004
- RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 22:21
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 22:09
- RE: control of the DNS zone vs control of the email system, Gordon Fecyk, 20:09
- RE: Real work items (Was: DNS etc.), Gordon Fecyk, 18:55
- Re: Real work items (Was: DNS etc.), Hector Santos, 10:32
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:24
- Real work items (Was: DNS etc.), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:06
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hadmut Danisch, 10:05
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Yakov Shafranovich, 09:40
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Ted Hardie, 09:10
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 09:00
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:53
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Ted Hardie, 08:19
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 07:45
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:31
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, ned . freed, 07:28
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 07:24
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:14
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 07:13
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, John Leslie, 05:03
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 01:02
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 01:00
March 11, 2004
- control of the DNS zone vs control of the email system, wayne, 22:40
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 22:02
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 21:46
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, ned . freed, 20:45
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 19:59
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, John Levine, 19:24
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, ned . freed, 19:11
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:39
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:37
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Patrik Fältström, 16:12
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, John Leslie, 16:11
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:03
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Dave Crocker, 15:39
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Ólafur Guðmundsson, 15:22
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 14:40
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 14:40
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, wayne, 14:29
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hector Santos, 14:20
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:15
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Ted Hardie, 14:00
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Alan DeKok, 13:58
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 13:56
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Alan DeKok, 13:54
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:49
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:48
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 13:37
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hector Santos, 13:22
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 13:22
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 13:20
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Dave Crocker, 13:15
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Alan DeKok, 13:13
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, wayne, 13:09
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 12:55
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Ted Hardie, 12:48
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Markus Stumpf, 12:40
- Economics & deployment (was Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet? ), Alan DeKok, 12:39
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:19
- Re: authentication or authorization?, Hector Santos, 12:09
- Re: Authentication and Authorization, Edwin Aoki, 12:04
- RE: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:03
- RE: authentication or authorization?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:43
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Dave Crocker, 11:11
- RE: Authentication and Authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:43
- Authentication and Authorization, Hadmut Danisch, 09:41
- Re: authentication or authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 09:28
- Re: authentication or authorization?, wayne, 09:01
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 08:59
- Re: authentication or authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 08:48
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Markus Stumpf, 08:39
- Re: authentication or authorization?, Hector Santos, 05:14
- authentication or authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 04:48
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Jon Kyme, 02:47
March 10, 2004
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 22:51
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, ned . freed, 21:34
- Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 21:27
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 21:24
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, ned . freed, 21:23
- Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 21:14
- Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, John Levine, 21:10
- Some thoughts on the costs of Block vs Factored queries, Meng Weng Wong, 21:08
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 20:59
- Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hector Santos, 20:31
- Re: Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Patrik Fältström, 20:05
- Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 19:48
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 19:44
- Potential Work Item: New DNS resource records, Gordon Fecyk, 19:37
- RE: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, Gordon Fecyk, 19:34
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 19:33
- Re: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 19:19
- RE: Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, Gordon Fecyk, 19:10
- RE: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 18:59
- RE: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:51
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, wayne, 18:36
- Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 18:24
- Re: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Edwin Aoki, 17:31
- Questions about DNS lookups in DMP and FSV, wayne, 17:28
- RE: [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:13
- [Back to Normal] RE: Three major areas of concentration, Gordon Fecyk, 16:19
- Re: Input documents vs. work items., Ted Hardie, 16:03
- Administrative roles connecting to assertions of identity, Ted Hardie, 15:59
- Input documents vs. work items., Ted Hardie, 15:23
- Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich, 13:40
- Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Hector Santos, 13:23
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Alan DeKok, 13:17
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Dave Crocker, 13:00
- Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Dave Crocker, 12:13
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Philip Miller, 12:06
- Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Philip Miller, 11:52
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, Alan DeKok, 10:28
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, Alan DeKok, 09:48
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Meng Weng Wong, 09:13
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Markus Stumpf, 09:09
- Re: Three major areas of concentration, Markus Stumpf, 08:39
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, Yakov Shafranovich, 06:33
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, wayne, 06:07
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, Yakov Shafranovich, 05:41
- Three major areas of concentration, Meng Weng Wong, 05:22
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, Jon Kyme, 04:41
March 09, 2004
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, Yakov Shafranovich, 22:33
- Re: Not ignoring previous research, Gordon Fecyk, 21:15
- Re: LMAP Validation Analysis, Hector Santos, 20:50
- LMAP Validation Analysis, Hector Santos, 20:41
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, wayne, 20:10
- RE: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 20:10
- Re: What semantics are conveyed, wayne, 19:46
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 16:20
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Markus Stumpf, 15:48
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Markus Stumpf, 15:34
- RE: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 13:08
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Edwin Aoki, 12:51
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 12:42
- RE: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Gordon Fecyk, 12:35
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 12:25
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 12:20
- What semantics are conveyed (was Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet? ), Alan DeKok, 12:17
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Alan DeKok, 11:44
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Edwin Aoki, 11:43
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Hadmut Danisch, 11:30
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Ted Hardie, 11:04
- Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?, Patrik Fältström, 06:04
March 05, 2004
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Gordon Fecyk, 17:43
- [META] Replies to the list, Gordon Fecyk, 12:13
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Yakov Shafranovich, 12:08
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Gordon Fecyk, 12:03
- [Fwd: [Asrg] videos of the IETF BoF], Yakov Shafranovich, 11:40
March 04, 2004
- Re: Giving it some structure, Markus Stumpf, 12:30
- Giving it some structure, Hadmut Danisch, 12:03
- Re: Simple Policy Control Protocol, Hadmut Danisch, 11:50
- Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Alan DeKok, 11:31
- RE: Deficiencies in LMAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:27
- Re: Simple Policy Control Protocol, Yakov Shafranovich, 11:15
- Simple Policy Control Protocol, Hadmut Danisch, 11:10
- Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich, 11:09
- Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Markus Stumpf, 11:08
- Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Yakov Shafranovich, 11:01
- RE: Deficiencies in LMAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:48
- Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Markus Stumpf, 09:55
- RE: Perimeter security (was: MBONE access?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:35
- Re: Some slides from the meeting this morning, Patrik Fältström, 04:15
- Some slides from the meeting this morning, Meng Weng Wong, 04:10
- Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Jon Kyme, 03:06
- Sorry, Hadmut Danisch, 00:00
March 03, 2004
- FW: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:35
- Preliminary minutes from the meeting this morning, Patrik Fältström, 21:08
- BOF Jabber Logs, Yakov Shafranovich, 20:26
- RE: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:44
- RE: MBONE access?, Jeroen Massar, 18:10
- RMX++ slides, Hadmut Danisch, 17:03
- Re: Deficiencies in LMAP, Philip Miller, 16:29
- RE: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:24
- RE: Deficiencies in LMAP, Gordon Fecyk, 16:05
- Re: MBONE access?, ned . freed, 15:32
- Re: Passing authentication information via SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich, 15:26
- Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, Yakov Shafranovich, 15:16
- Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, John Leslie, 15:02
- Re: MBONE access?, Hadmut Danisch, 14:30
- Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, Yakov Shafranovich, 13:20
- MBONE access?, Hadmut Danisch, 12:38
- Deficiencies in LMAP, Alan DeKok, 10:09
- Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, John Leslie, 04:02
- Re: Principles of Spam Abatement, Hadmut Danisch, 03:30
- Principles of Spam Abatement, John Leslie, 01:07
March 01, 2004
- RE: we made CNN...., Gordon Fecyk, 18:34
- Re: we made CNN...., Patrik Fältström, 17:30
- RE: we made CNN...., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:25
- Re: we made CNN...., Patrik Fältström, 17:10
- RE: we made CNN...., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:09
- Re: we made CNN...., Steven M. Bellovin, 17:01
- RE: we made CNN...., Gordon Fecyk, 16:30
- RE: we made CNN...., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:14