Re: Everyone back from Seoul yet?

Ted Hardie <hardie(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> wrote:
> I'd say the broad question is "What are the semantics that this record
> needs to convey" and the first key question is "What *identity* is it
> that needs to be authorized".
  Would the LMAP discussion document be acceptable as a WG item?

  It's a start at this process, and contains a summary of nearly a
year of dicussion on this topic.

  Alan DeKok.