On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 07:14:58PM -0600, Gordon Fecyk wrote:
Another possibility is considering the combination of 2821 MAIL FROM
_and_ the originating IP together as an identity.
That's assuming that Users are going to see the originating IP. Which I've
pointed out they aren't, nor would they care to. "Hey Aruna, your new e-mail
address is
arunah206(_dot_)45(_dot_)235(_dot_)30(_at_)gctc-mst(_dot_)com(_dot_)" I'd
hate to see the IPv6
version.
I'm not sure I understand. My suggestion was that the combination of
2821 MAIL FROM and the originating IP (i.e., the IP of the originating
MX) in combination could be considered an "identity" about which the
receiving MTA could make judgments. I don't see how that would relate
to altering the contents of the 2822 From: header. Could you explain?
Re: The 4/5 conference: Again, I'd love to attend, but I have a weekly
meeting on Mondays at 1pm Pacific, so I'm unable to participate.
--
Mark C. Langston Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org http://www.seti.org