Let me use a different way of saying this...
If "just" the people which have been thinking about what they want to
express, I am pretty sure the DNS people can come up with an encoding
of the new RR type which is to be defined, according to Ted's suggested
solution to the new RR Type specification.
Remember, the DNS people promised exactly this at the BOF.
paf
On May 22, 2004, at 22:02, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 5/22/2004 2:27 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
(I still don't think XML is a good idea in DNS TXT records, so this
It's a rotten idea, exhibiting a complete lack of understanding about
the
nature of DNS.
If folks aren't going to use small fast datagrams that will work within
the cache-intensive infrastructure, they should use another protocol.
--
Eric A. Hall
http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/