IETF MARID (date)
May 30, 2004
- RE: Wide-Open MARID, Greg Connor, 08:38
- RE: Wide-Open MADRID, Douglas Otis, 08:03
- RE: Wide-Open MADRID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:49
- RE: Wide-Open MADRID, Sauer, Damon, 05:53
May 29, 2004
- Re: Duplicate messages, John Leslie, 12:38
- Re: Duplicate messages, Eric A. Hall, 12:36
- RE: List management: messages repeated, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:28
- List management: messages repeated, Greg Connor, 12:02
- Duplicate messages, Nate Leon, 11:59
- RE: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:32
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Alan DeKok, 07:56
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 07:40
- Re: Wild card MXes, Alan DeKok, 07:34
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Olson, Margaret, 05:13
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Jon Kyme, 01:30
- RE: Wild card MXes, Greg Connor, 00:47
May 28, 2004
- Re: Re submission of draft-ietf-marid-core-00, Marshall Rose, 19:01
- Re submission of draft-ietf-marid-core-00, Jim Lyon, 18:23
- Submission of draft-ietf-marid-core-00, Jim Lyon, 17:04
- Submission of draft-ietf-marid-submitter-00, Harry Katz, 17:04
- Wildcard problem solved: Was: www. convention and wildcards, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:32
- Re: Wild card MXes, william(at)elan.net, 16:25
- RE: Wild card MXes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:22
- RE: Wild card MXes, william(at)elan.net, 16:14
- RE: Wild card MXes, Ryan Ordway, 15:54
- Re: the MARID mailing list, Greg Connor, 15:52
- Re: www. convention and wildcards, Neil Brown, 15:51
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Meng Weng Wong, 15:46
- Re: Wild card MXes, Meng Weng Wong, 15:43
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 15:07
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Mark C. Langston, 14:49
- RE: Wild card MXes, william(at)elan.net, 14:43
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Jon Kyme, 13:27
- RE: Wild card MXes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:16
- www. convention and wildcards, Bob Atkinson, 12:59
- RE: Wide-Open MADRID, Sauer, Damon, 12:39
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Guillaume Filion, 12:13
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Alan DeKok, 12:03
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 11:49
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Aredridel, 11:40
- RE: Wide-Open MADRID, Sauer, Damon, 11:33
- Re: Wide-Open MADRID, Guillaume Filion, 10:58
- RE: Wide-Open MADRID, Jim Lyon, 10:54
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 10:53
- Re: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, Edward Lewis, 10:51
- RE: Wild card MXes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:46
- RE: Wild card MXes, Greg Connor, 10:41
- RE: Wild card MXes, Edward Lewis, 10:37
- Wide-Open MADRID, Sauer, Damon, 10:33
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 10:29
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 10:17
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 09:41
- Re: Wild card MXes, wayne, 09:21
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 09:09
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 09:07
- RE: Wild card MXes, Edward Lewis, 08:37
- RE: Wild card MXes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:18
- RE: Wild card MXes, Olson, Margaret, 07:05
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., wayne, 04:28
- Re: Wild card MXes, wayne, 04:15
May 27, 2004
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 23:00
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 22:34
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 22:25
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., John Levine, 22:20
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 22:14
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 22:13
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 22:11
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 22:04
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 21:58
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., Eric A. Hall, 21:25
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., wayne, 21:23
- RE: Wild card MXes and Microsoft, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:18
- Re: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, John Levine, 21:03
- RE: Thought on DNS record types., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:43
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., wayne, 20:35
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., Eric A. Hall, 19:51
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 19:39
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 19:31
- Re: Thought on DNS record types., wayne, 19:29
- RE: Wild card MXes and Microsoft, william(at)elan.net, 19:24
- RE: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, Bob Atkinson, 18:50
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 18:45
- Thought on DNS record types., Neil Brown, 18:27
- RE: Wild card MXes, Gordon Fecyk, 16:02
- Re: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, Dave Crocker, 15:52
- Re: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, John Levine, 15:03
- RE: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:02
- RE: Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, Bob Atkinson, 14:21
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 14:10
- Distilling Wildcards for MARID Monday, Andrew Newton, 13:39
- RE: Wild card MXes, Gordon Fecyk, 13:20
- Re: FYI - RFC2915 (NAPTR), william(at)elan.net, 02:53
- Re: FYI - RFC2915 (NAPTR), william(at)elan.net, 02:37
- RE: Measuring MARID, Jon Kyme, 02:10
May 26, 2004
- RE: Wild card MXes, Bob Atkinson, 20:51
- RE: FYI - RFC3123, Bob Atkinson, 20:44
- RE: Some stats on TXT usage in domain names, Michel Py, 19:08
- Re: FYI - RFC2915 (NAPTR), william(at)elan.net, 18:44
- RE: FYI - RFC3123, Gordon Fecyk, 18:25
- FYI - RFC2915 (NAPTR), william(at)elan.net, 18:13
- Re: Some stats on TXT usage in domain names, wayne, 18:11
- zonecuts (Was: Wild card MXes), wayne, 17:08
- Re: FYI - RFC3123, william(at)elan.net, 17:04
- Re: FYI - RFC3123, wayne, 16:47
- Re: Wild card MXes, Philip Miller, 16:07
- FYI - RFC3123, william(at)elan.net, 15:46
- Re: Wild card MXes, Greg Connor, 15:00
- Re: Wild card MXes, David Blacka, 14:52
- Re: Wild card MXes, Andrew Newton, 14:45
- Re: Wild card MXes, Rand Wacker, 14:19
- Re: Wild card MXes, Matthew Elvey, 13:58
- Re: Wild card MXes, Rand Wacker, 13:52
- Re: Wild card MXes, Matthew Elvey, 13:21
- RE: New Drafts being developed; invitation to join spf-discuss, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:53
- RE: Measuring MARID, Sauer, Damon, 04:57
- RE: Measuring MARID, Jon Kyme, 04:39
May 25, 2004
- RE: Measuring MARID, Gordon Fecyk, 19:41
- RE: Measuring MARID, Sauer, Damon, 17:59
- RE: Measuring MARID, Gordon Fecyk, 15:43
- RE: Measuring MARID, Gordon Fecyk, 15:36
- RE: Wild card MXes, John R Levine, 14:25
- Re: Measuring MARID, Alan DeKok, 13:41
- RE: Wild card MXes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:30
- Re: Wild card MXes, william(at)elan.net, 12:51
- Schedule, Harry Katz, 11:57
- Re: Wild card MXes, John Levine, 11:25
- RE: Measuring MARID, Sauer, Damon, 10:20
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 10:13
- Re: Measuring MARID, Alan DeKok, 10:11
- Re: Wild card MXes, Eric A. Hall, 09:43
- Re: Wild card MXes, Dave Crocker, 08:45
- Re: Wild card MXes, Greg Connor, 08:45
- Re: New Drafts being developed; invitation to join spf-discuss, Andrew Newton, 08:22
- Re: New Drafts being developed; invitation to join spf-discuss, Ted Hardie, 08:10
- Re: Wild card MXes, John R Levine, 08:05
- Re: Wild card MXes, Andrew Newton, 07:57
- Re: Wild card MXes, John R Levine, 07:24
- Re: Wild card MXes, Andrew Newton, 06:57
- Re: New Drafts being developed; invitation to join spf-discuss, wayne, 06:53
- RE: Wild card MXes, Olson, Margaret, 05:53
- RE: Measuring MARID, Sauer, Damon, 05:19
- Re: Wild card MXes, william(at)elan.net, 01:39
May 24, 2004
- Re: Measuring MARID, Greg Connor, 23:21
- Measuring MARID, Gordon Fecyk, 21:56
- RE: invitation to join spf-discuss, Gordon Fecyk, 20:48
- Wild card MXes, John Levine, 20:35
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Douglas Otis, 19:14
- Re: New Drafts being developed; invitation to join spf-discuss, Andrew Newton, 19:00
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Douglas Otis, 18:43
- Re: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Andrew Newton, 18:41
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Bob Atkinson, 17:05
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Bob Atkinson, 17:01
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:54
- Re: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Douglas Otis, 16:50
- Re: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Andrew Newton, 15:58
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Bob Atkinson, 15:30
- RE: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Douglas Otis, 14:59
- New Drafts being developed; invitation to join spf-discuss, Meng Weng Wong, 11:07
- Re: draft minutes of the MARID interim meeting on May 19 & 20, John Levine, 09:09
- draft minutes of the MARID interim meeting on May 19 & 20, Andrew Newton, 06:34
May 23, 2004
- slideshow on convergence, Meng Weng Wong, 17:50
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Greg Connor, 08:51
- RE: practicalities, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:48
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Jon Kyme, 03:34
- MARID first, TXT second, Meng Weng Wong, 01:36
May 22, 2004
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 23:59
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Greg Connor, 20:56
- Re: practicalities, Eric A. Hall, 19:47
- RE: practicalities, Gordon Fecyk, 19:07
- Re: XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Douglas Otis, 17:31
- practicalities, Eric A. Hall, 17:15
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 16:54
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Greg Connor, 16:37
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 15:22
- XML name space (was: suggested new RRtype experiment), Jim Lyon, 15:21
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Jim Lyon, 15:00
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Andrew Newton, 14:49
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Douglas Otis, 14:25
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Patrik Fältström, 13:16
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 13:02
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Andrew Newton, 11:46
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Jim Lyon, 10:45
May 21, 2004
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Douglas Otis, 22:25
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Jim Lyon, 17:57
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Douglas Otis, 17:43
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 17:19
- SPF to XML converter, wayne, 16:20
- Some stats on TXT usage in domain names, wayne, 16:11
- SPF rollout, Narasimhan, Madhu, 16:10
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Douglas Otis, 15:56
- RE: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, william(at)elan.net, 15:02
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 14:01
- RE: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:53
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Douglas Otis, 13:50
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 12:54
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Douglas Otis, 12:20
- batv an csv revision estimate, Dave Crocker, 11:58
- RE: [spf-discuss] PTR Domain validation idea, william(at)elan.net, 11:50
- RE: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Ted Hardie, 11:50
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 10:59
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 10:39
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 10:28
- RE: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 10:25
- Re: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:19
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 10:09
- Re: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Margaret Olson, 10:06
- RE: Wildcards, Bob Atkinson, 10:05
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 10:05
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 10:04
- RE: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 10:01
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 09:59
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:51
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 09:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] PTR Domain validation idea, Jim Lyon, 09:14
- [spf-discuss] PTR Domain validation idea, william(at)elan.net, 02:06
- Re: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 00:11
May 20, 2004
- CID draft published, Yakov Shafranovich, 21:48
- Re: Wildcards, John Levine, 21:18
- Meeting summary?, Yakov Shafranovich, 19:48
- Alternative Name for RFrom: Tracking, Douglas Otis, 19:31
- RE: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 18:42
- Re: "Bob Atkinson": RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Michael Richardson, 18:22
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 17:31
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 17:30
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 17:29
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 17:28
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Yakov Shafranovich, 17:22
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 17:21
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 17:06
- ipr, Ted Hardie, 16:59
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 16:58
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 16:56
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Yakov Shafranovich, 16:51
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 16:38
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 16:37
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 16:30
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 16:24
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Eric A. Hall, 15:59
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 13:42
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 13:25
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Yakov Shafranovich, 13:03
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Yakov Shafranovich, 12:49
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 12:37
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, william(at)elan.net, 11:57
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 11:49
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Meng Weng Wong, 11:37
- RE: suggested new RRtype experiment, Bob Atkinson, 11:01
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Patrik Fältström, 09:35
- Re: Jim Lyon's slides re: convergence of SPF and Caller Id, Eric Allman, 09:34
- Jim Lyon's slides re: convergence of SPF and Caller Id, Eric Allman, 09:31
- Re: suggested new RRtype experiment, Andrew Newton, 05:12
- suggested new RRtype experiment, Meng Weng Wong, 01:03
May 19, 2004
- Re: Wildcards, Tony Hansen, 12:13
- draft-crocker-marid-* links that work, Dave Crocker, 11:53
- Re: Wildcards, John Leslie, 11:44
- Re: New RR type and "additional" records, Douglas Otis, 10:48
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Marshall Rose, 10:25
- New RR type and "additional" records, Greg Connor, 10:14
- Re: Wildcards, Peter Koch, 09:56
- Re: Wildcards, Greg Connor, 09:52
- Re: Wildcards, Tony Finch, 09:52
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Matthew Elvey, 09:36
- Re: Wildcards, Ted Hardie, 08:54
- Re: Wildcards, Yakov Shafranovich, 08:43
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Yakov Shafranovich, 08:26
- Wildcards, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:26
- Re: Bounce Address Tag Validation (BATV), John Leslie, 07:37
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Andrew Newton, 06:45
- Concrete proposal for MARID dns record, william(at)elan.net, 04:37
- Re: Bounce Address Tag Validation (BATV), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04:06
- Bounce Address Tag Validation (BATV), Dave Crocker, 03:49
- MARID viewed in two parts (policy record decisions and dns implementation details), william(at)elan.net, 01:38
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Patrik Fältström, 00:43
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Patrik Fältström, 00:43
May 18, 2004
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Greg Connor, 21:15
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Matthew Elvey, 20:37
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, william(at)elan.net, 17:23
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Eric A. Hall, 17:17
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Douglas Otis, 16:43
- Re: Use of TXT is rather conclusively a good idea., Matthew Elvey, 16:14
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Pete Resnick, 14:16
- RE: implementation compliance [RE: Reuse of TXT], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:16
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 14:07
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Matthew Elvey, 13:47
- Re: implementation compliance [RE: Reuse of TXT], Matthew Elvey, 13:31
- Updates to docs, Douglas Otis, 13:16
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Matthew Elvey, 13:02
- RE: implementation compliance [RE: Reuse of TXT], Edward Lewis, 12:33
- RE: implementation compliance [RE: Reuse of TXT], Ted Hardie, 12:06
- RE: implementation compliance [RE: Reuse of TXT], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:45
- Re: A 40% solution?, John Leslie, 11:38
- Client SMTP Validation (CVS) proposal update, Dave Crocker, 11:16
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Pete Resnick, 10:30
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Edward Lewis, 10:21
- implementation compliance [RE: Reuse of TXT], roy, 10:14
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 10:05
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Matthew Elvey, 09:55
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 09:47
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 09:26
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Matthew Elvey, 09:07
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Pete Resnick, 09:06
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, wayne, 08:45
- Yahoo! Mail Publishes Specification for DomainKeys, Larry Seltzer, 07:46
- RE: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:45
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, wayne, 06:42
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Patrik Fältström, 05:08
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Andrew Newton, 03:56
May 17, 2004
- RE: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:48
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, wayne, 19:42
- Revised SRV-CAA doc and SMTP-CAA doc, Douglas Otis, 18:29
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 16:01
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 14:47
- response to .mxout. question and suggestions, April Lorenzen, 11:21
- Re: MARID Mondays, Andrew Newton, 10:49
- Re: Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 10:19
- Reuse of TXT : draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt, Patrik Fältström, 04:34
May 15, 2004
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Yakov Shafranovich, 21:25
- Re: Draft submitted for Client Address Authorization., Douglas Otis, 20:56
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Meng Weng Wong, 20:51
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Matthew Elvey, 16:24
- Re: IPv6/MARID, william(at)elan.net, 11:01
- Re: IPv6/MARID, Andrew Newton, 05:40
- Internet Mail Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 01:36
- Re: Draft submitted for Client Address Authorization., william(at)elan.net, 01:18
May 14, 2004
- Re: Draft submitted for Client Address Authorization., Matthew Elvey, 19:32
- Draft submitted for Client Address Authorization., Douglas Otis, 16:32
- RE: The Computational Load of MARID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:23
- RE: Don't get MARID confused with anti-spam proposals (was: The C omputational Load of MARID), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:11
- Re: Don't get MARID confused with anti-spam proposals, Matthew Elvey, 12:19
- Don't get MARID confused with anti-spam proposals (was: The Computational Load of MARID), william(at)elan.net, 11:12
- Re: IPv6/MARID, william(at)elan.net, 10:36
- Re: IPv6/MARID, Aredridel, 10:11
- Re: A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 09:31
- RE: The Computational Load of MARID, Harry Katz, 09:06
- Re: IPv6/MARID, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:02
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Jon Kyme, 09:00
- Re: IPv6/MARID, Yakov Shafranovich, 08:56
- Re: IPv6/MARID, Jeroen Massar, 08:52
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Aredridel, 08:46
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, wayne, 08:41
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Aredridel, 08:39
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Tony Finch, 08:32
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Yakov Shafranovich, 08:23
- IPv6/MARID, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:23
- RE: The Computational Load of MARID, Sauer, Damon, 08:15
- RE: The Computational Load of MARID, Michel Py, 07:58
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Jon Kyme, 07:39
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, John Leslie, 07:38
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Jon Kyme, 07:34
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:21
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Tony Finch, 07:18
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Aredridel, 07:16
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Jon Kyme, 07:12
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Jon Kyme, 07:04
- Re: The Computational Load of MARID, Tony Finch, 07:04
- The Computational Load of MARID, John Leslie, 06:19
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Neil Brown, 04:50
- Re: Head count for MARID interim meeting, Andrew Newton, 04:49
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Neil Brown, 04:24
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Neil Brown, 03:26
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Roy Badami, 01:54
May 13, 2004
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Alan DeKok, 23:53
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Michel Py, 23:48
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Michel Py, 23:01
- Re: A 30% solution, wayne, 21:36
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Neil Brown, 19:27
- Re: A 40% solution?, John Leslie, 19:23
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Roy Badami, 19:13
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Neil Brown, 17:22
- Re: A 40% solution?, Andrew Newton, 14:34
- Re: A 40% solution?, John Leslie, 14:17
- Re: What to check? (was Re: Caller ID and ease of adoption, Matthew Elvey, 13:25
- Re: A 30% solution ; a 40% solution, Matthew Elvey, 12:20
- Re: A 40% solution?, Andrew Newton, 11:40
- Re: RHSBL scalability (affects MARID proposals)., Yakov Shafranovich, 11:17
- RE: A 30% solution, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:38
- Re: A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 10:17
- Re: RHSBL scalability (affects MARID proposals)., Matthew Elvey, 10:12
- Re: A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 09:58
- Re: A 30% solution ; a 40% solution, Pete Resnick, 09:44
- Re: A 40% solution?, Marshall Rose, 09:00
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Michel Py, 08:49
- Re: A 30% solution, wayne, 08:26
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, wayne, 07:27
- Re: RHSBL scalability (affects MARID proposals)., John Leslie, 06:24
- Re: RHSBL scalability (affects MARID proposals)., Tony Finch, 06:04
- Re: A 40% solution?, John Leslie, 05:53
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Tony Finch, 05:53
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Tony Finch, 05:50
- Re: Head count for MARID interim meeting, Andrew Newton, 04:03
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost (was: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment) campaign, Roy Badami, 02:47
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Jon Kyme, 01:37
May 12, 2004
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Greg Connor, 23:00
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Greg Connor, 22:38
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Greg Connor, 22:23
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Neil Brown, 22:19
- RE: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, Michel Py, 21:58
- RHSBL scalability (affects MARID proposals)., Matthew Elvey, 20:45
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost, wayne, 20:45
- Re: A 40% solution?, Marshall Rose, 20:14
- Re: A 30% solution ; a 40% solution, Matthew Elvey, 19:48
- Re: Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost (was: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment) campaign, Matthew Elvey, 19:48
- Re: A 40% solution?, John Leslie, 18:22
- Re: A 40% solution?, Matthew Elvey, 17:15
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Matthew Elvey, 17:13
- RE: Do it yourself CSV, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:35
- draft agenda for MARID Interim meeting, Andrew Newton, 14:58
- Adoption of MARID, SPF and alternatives and thoughts on cost (was: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment) campaign, Roy Badami, 14:09
- A 40% solution?, John Leslie, 11:51
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Tony Finch, 11:27
- Re: A 30% solution, John Leslie, 11:21
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Dave Crocker, 11:03
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Tony Finch, 10:52
- Re: Do it yourself CSV, Dave Crocker, 10:37
- Re: A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 07:56
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Tony Finch, 02:45
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Alan DeKok, 02:03
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Jon Kyme, 01:37
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Bill McQuillan, 00:37
May 11, 2004
- Do it yourself CSV, John Levine, 22:16
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Meng Weng Wong, 21:32
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, ned . freed, 21:12
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Aredridel, 19:54
- Re: A 30% solution, wayne, 19:48
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Pete Resnick, 19:24
- Re: A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 19:21
- Re: my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Dave Crocker, 18:46
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Matthew Elvey, 18:00
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Matthew Elvey, 17:16
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Tony Finch, 15:59
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Matthew Elvey, 15:38
- Re: A 30% solution, Dave Crocker, 14:33
- my working definition of 2821.mail-from, Meng Weng Wong, 14:20
- Re: A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 14:17
- Re: A 30% solution, Dave Crocker, 13:57
- Re: Head count for MARID interim meeting, Ted Hardie, 13:40
- A 30% solution, Pete Resnick, 13:39
- Head count for MARID interim meeting, Andrew Newton, 12:09
- RE: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campa ign, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:35
- Re: Semantics and Syntax, wayne, 09:15
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, wayne, 08:58
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Jon Kyme, 08:58
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Marshall Rose, 08:26
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, wayne, 07:44
- Re: on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Jon Kyme, 06:08
- on per-user macros; and the IETF's role in a deployment campaign, Meng Weng Wong, 04:10
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 03:24
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Tony Finch, 03:18
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Meng Weng Wong, 02:12
- Re: SPF and complexity, Tony Finch, 02:02
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Meng Weng Wong, 01:34
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Tony Finch, 01:23
- RE: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 01:12
May 10, 2004
- SPF and complexity, wayne, 22:09
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble (paging Meng Wong), Matthew Elvey, 19:13
- RE: Semantics: per user policy, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:59
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, Douglas Otis, 17:06
- MARID Specification Proposals and IETF IPR Notices, Andrew Newton, 13:10
- Re: It it worth changing SMTP to deter joe jobs?, Alan DeKok, 12:34
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, Meng Weng Wong, 12:07
- Re: It it worth changing SMTP to deter joe jobs?, John Levine, 10:56
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, Douglas Otis, 09:46
- Re: Soundings ? RE: Semantics and Syntax, rbarclay, 09:34
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, Tony Finch, 07:48
- Re: It it worth changing SMTP to deter joe jobs?, Alan DeKok, 07:31
May 09, 2004
- Re: It it worth changing SMTP to deter joe jobs?, Matthew Elvey, 14:09
- It it worth changing SMTP to deter joe jobs?, John Levine, 11:33
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 09:32
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, John Levine, 09:26
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, Alan DeKok, 06:12
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 05:40
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 01:00
May 08, 2004
- Re: The roaming user problem is insoluble, william(at)elan.net, 23:53
- The roaming user problem is insoluble, John Levine, 21:42
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, John Leslie, 17:05
- Re: Soundings ? RE: Semantics and Syntax, John Leslie, 16:52
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Greg Connor, 12:17
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 11:26
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 10:50
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Bill Fenner, 10:37
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 10:03
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 10:00
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 08:59
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Bill Fenner, 08:31
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 06:47
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Alan DeKok, 06:20
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 04:26
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 04:15
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 03:30
- Re: Semantics: per user policy, Jon Kyme, 00:49
May 07, 2004
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Matthew Elvey, 18:47
- Mail archive, Roy Badami, 17:20
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Greg Connor, 16:35
- Semantics: per user policy, Roy Badami, 16:27
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Meng Weng Wong, 11:54
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Tony Finch, 04:26
May 06, 2004
- CSV+NBB, Matthew Elvey, 23:15
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Matthew Elvey, 22:28
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Greg Connor, 21:31
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Matthew Elvey, 20:31
- RE: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:05
- Re: Question on solution scope and semantics, Douglas Otis, 16:58
- Question on solution scope and semantics, rbarclay, 13:08
- <responsible-client> versus <sending-host>, Douglas Otis, 13:01
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Tony Finch, 10:34
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Matthew Elvey, 10:15
- Semantics DMP type lookups, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:36
- Flags, operators, structure, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:27
- RE: Soundings ? RE: Semantics and Syntax, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:37
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Jon Kyme, 07:00
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Tony Finch, 06:38
May 05, 2004
- Re: Soundings ? RE: Semantics and Syntax, John Leslie, 14:08
- Re: Semantics and Syntax, Pete Resnick, 13:18
- Soundings ? RE: Semantics and Syntax, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:40
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Hector Santos, 10:33
- RE: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:05
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Tony Finch, 04:22
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:50
- RE: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Tony Finch, 02:38
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Dave Crocker, 01:01
May 04, 2004
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion:NBB), Dave Crocker, 18:28
- draft-crocker-marid-smtp-validate-00.txt, Tony Finch, 10:57
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Douglas Otis, 10:13
- Re: Caller-ID group is hiring!, Dave Crocker, 02:50
May 03, 2004
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Philip Miller, 20:58
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Greg Connor, 20:34
- RE: Semantics and Syntax, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:38
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Philip Miller, 13:45
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion:NBB), Matthew Elvey, 13:23
- Re: Semantics and Syntax, Greg Connor, 11:40
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Alan DeKok, 10:09
- Re: Semantics and Syntax, Douglas Otis, 10:03
- RE: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:50
- Re: Semantics and Syntax, Yakov Shafranovich, 09:49
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Meng Weng Wong, 09:22
- RE: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:48
- Semantics and Syntax, wayne, 08:06
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Meng Weng Wong, 07:57
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), wayne, 07:37
- Re: CSV (Crocker's draft) good! (evaluation, big suggestion), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:04