--Matthew Elvey <matthew(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> wrote:
Perhaps I'm slow, but I look at this thread and I can't tell whether most
folks like CSV+NBB. Greg C seems to like it. Compared to SPF, it's
orders of magnitude less effort to adopt. It doesn't provide
accountability as granular as SPF, which is partly why it is easier to
adopt.
What? No I don't. :)
I think the point I was trying to make was that SPF does what CSV does and
more, without having to create SRV records.
Do we need, e.g. a Wiki table with names in column 1 and contender
acronyms along the top that folks can fill in?
E.g.
Proposal
Participant SPF NBB FSV MMark ...
Actually I would like to see us chime in on features...
There used to be a comparison of DMP/RMX/SPF on the SPF site... but I
couldn't find it now. Hmm.
--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>