On 5/6/2004 9:31 PM, Greg Connor sent forth electrons to convey:
--Matthew Elvey <matthew(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> wrote:
Perhaps I'm slow, but I look at this thread and I can't tell whether
most
folks like CSV+NBB. Greg C seems to like it. Compared to SPF, it's
orders of magnitude less effort to adopt. It doesn't provide
accountability as granular as SPF, which is partly why it is easier to
adopt.
What? No I don't. :)
"That's an interesting idea. I like it. However ..." began your
comment on CSV+NBB.
I think the point I was trying to make was that SPF does what CSV does
and more,
Aye, it does what CSV does, and more: it requires that some two orders
of magnitude more systems be touched in order to implement it, as I
explained in my original post. Not a good thing.
without having to create SRV records.
I advocated CSV switch to use TXT records in my second post to this
thread! And you didn't say a thing about SRV records in that post!
Do we need, e.g. a Wiki table with names in column 1 and contender
acronyms along the top that folks can fill in?
E.g.
Proposal
Participant SPF NBB FSV MMark ...
Actually I would like to see us chime in on features...
I tried, and failed here:
http://asrg.sp.am/wiki?OpinionMatrix so I tried again here:
http://wiki.fastmail.fm/wiki/index.php/AntiSpamOptionsMatrix