Ok... What if I said ~PLEASE~
~PLEASE~ can we limit the CIDR to something more granular than "v=spf1 +all"
It would REALLY help. If we limit it to /24 and you have to add a few more
ip4:'s..... big deal!
Regards,
Damon Sauer
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Guillaume
Filion
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 3:14 PM
To: ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Wide-Open MADRID
"Sauer, Damon" <Damon(_dot_)Sauer(_at_)BELLSOUTH(_dot_)COM>
Well.. That is an awful lot of domain names to block. Especially if
the
spammer randomly generates a few hundred a day for the same netblock.
Easier for me to block netblocks.
Both will work... But I still think that it would be even better if we
could limit the netblock so that I could have a choice.
At least, the spammer will have to pay a few bucks for each domain, which will
reduce his profit.
Also, big anti-spam sites like spamcop could create "reputation lists" for
validated domains. For example, imc.org has sent 96866593 emails, of which 3
have been reported as spam, that gives it a pretty good reputation. While
domain evilspammer.org has sent 1500 messages, of which 1000 were reported as
spam, it gives it a bad reputation.
Best,
GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/ PGP Key and more:
http://guillaume.filion.org/
*****
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking
of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 113