RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR

ietf-mxcomp

RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR

2004-06-11 17:59:37

I agree, MARID can't claim the TXT RR for it's own.


Let's be clear; this is NOT the plan of record in the current draft.

Rather, MARID is claiming the COMBINATION of a particular domain prefix
and TXT as it's own.

        Bob

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Bob Atkinson <= RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Michel Py RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Jon Kyme Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, wayne Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Jon Kyme RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Gordon Fecyk Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Meng Weng Wong Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Eric A. Hall Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Jon Kyme

Previous by Date:	Re: suggested path and arch, John Levine
Next by Date:	Re: MARID charter and using 2822 data, Marshall Rose
Previous by Thread:	[RFC 1464?] RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR was: Comments ondraft-ietf-marid-core-01 xml use, Gordon Fecyk
Next by Thread:	RE: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Michel Py
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]