Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML)
2004-06-23 08:20:07
On Jun 22, 2004, at 11:43 PM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Because this is an endless loop. An emotional loop. Caused by SPF.
Why?
Because SPF has never been a technical invention. SPF is only a public
relations coup of
a few people who were hijacking an idea to bring themselves in front
of the cameras
and the newspapers.
Okay, assuming you mean Meng, and myself in this group, I am very
insulted. How dare you imply that the countless hours of work we have
put into this are for self-aggrandizement. I don't get paid for this
work, nor do I even work for a company that sponsors my involvement. I
volunteered my efforts to help a build a tool for everyone.
OK, let's come back to technical arguments.
Sorry, I can't right now. I'm far too upset by what you've said above.
I am stunned that you would proceed in such a unprofessional manner,
and in the public forum of a standards body working group.
If your goal was to stymie any rational discussion, you've succeeded.
- Mark Lentczner
Mark Lentczner
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/
markl(_at_)glyphic(_dot_)com
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), (continued)
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Luis Bruno
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Sean Comeau
- RE: Why not XML, Michael R. Brumm
- Re: Why not XML, Hadmut Danisch
- TXT now, new RR later (was Re: Why not XML), Michael R. Brumm
- Re: TXT now, new RR later (was Re: Why not XML), Hadmut Danisch
- Re: TXT now, new RR later (was Re: Why not XML), Hadmut Danisch
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML),
Mark Lentczner <=
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Hadmut Danisch
- STOP NOW! (was Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML)), Andrew Newton
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Greg Connor
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Hadmut Danisch
- Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Greg Connor
- Could binary encoding really be the answer?, Greg Connor
- Re: Could binary encoding really be the answer?, Aredridel
- Re: Could binary encoding really be the answer?, Robert Barclay
- Re: Could binary encoding really be the answer?, Douglas Otis
- Re: Could binary encoding really be the answer?, william(at)elan.net
|
|
|