ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unified SPF: block versus factored records for HELO and MTAMAark scopes

2004-06-25 06:37:16

Dave Crocker writes:
If it were strictly a local matter, it would not need to be published in the DNS.

The problem is that the receiving SMTP server is required to interpret the SPF policy that is published by a sender some indeterminate number of MTA hops upstream.

That is very much NOT local.

Right. I'd like the publication to contain only an address/port. The receiving SMTP sender looks the address up, makes an RPC to the published address (e.g. using UDP, although BXXP is a possibility too), receives a well-defined FAIL/PASS/NEUTRAL answer, and that's it.

The address/port may be located at the site that makes the policy, or it may be at a third party which offers a wizard like that Pobox offers for SPF.

Arnt