Re: What Meng said

Andrew W. Donoho wrote:

> .... there is a very real chance that marketing may overwhelm the 
> standards process. We should tread carefully here. The rush to 
> specification for Sender-ID seems ill advised.
> ... The PRA and other mechanisms may offer value but, because of their 
> complexity, should be deferred until these simpler mechanism's 
> specifications are finalized. 
Thank you for the most rational and sensible post I've seen on this list 
in the past two months. Please, folks, can we pick some of the 
low-hanging fruit first?
Incidentally, Andrew, I tried to reply to you directly, but your SPF 
check bounces my mail. It does not appear that there is any way for me 
to send E-mail to you from any of my legitimate accounts.
<csg>