Re: What Meng said


On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Rand Wacker wrote:

So maybe "people" are reading the specs differently than Meng? ;)


Then the intent and the letter of the spec differ.  This has to be fixed,
or this will fall flat.

Your average implementor is not a mind-reader and is probably lazy enough
that she/he would not go through the list archive, and thus may (read:
likely would) miss such a subtlety.

Please revise the spec.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
What Meng said, Andrew Newton Re: What Meng said, Dave Crocker Re: What Meng said, ned . freed Re: What Meng said, Tony Finch Re: What Meng said, Dave Crocker Re: What Meng said, Rand Wacker Re: missing submitter, was What Meng said, John Levine Re: What Meng said, Murray S. Kucherawy <= Re: What Meng said, Meng Weng Wong Re: What Meng said, Michel Bouissou Re: What Meng said, Mark Lentczner Re: What Meng said, ned . freed Re: What Meng said, Jim Fenton Re: What Meng said, Tony Finch Re: What Meng said, Dave Crocker Re: What Meng said, Meng Weng Wong Re: What Meng said, Andrew W. Donoho Re: What Meng said, Carl S. Gutekunst

Previous by Date:	RE: What Meng said, Harry Katz
Next by Date:	Re: What Meng said, ned . freed
Previous by Thread:	Re: missing submitter, was What Meng said, John Levine
Next by Thread:	Re: What Meng said, Meng Weng Wong
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]