Andrew,
AN> In defense of "people", I reread marid-submitter and marid-core this
AN> morning and could not find the place where this was stated. However,
AN> this statement is significant. I'm not saying it is a good or bad
AN> idea, but it profoundly changes how SUBMITTER is used, the nexus of
AN> SUBMITTER and PRA, and even the semantics of the RR version identifier.
indeed.
submitter has been offered as an efficiency hack on the rfc2822-based
checking of sender-id. there has been no rfc2821.mailfrom in it.
so meng's statement would seem to change the basic semantics of
sender-id, depending upon whether submitter is present.
d/
--
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>