RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID

ietf-mxcomp

RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID

2004-09-03 13:50:04


I agree with some of the things you say Michael:

The MARID charter is "authenticate mail transfer".


Interesting, I went back to read the charter and notice that MARID has no
binding to do IP-based authentication (although it could be read that
way).  Maybe we *should* just go straight to a crypto-based solution.
That would seem to get around a lot of the disagreement currently on the
list.

-Rand

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, (continued) RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Scott Kitterman DEPLOY, jpinkerton Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Rand Wacker Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Matt Sergeant Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Rand Wacker Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Mark C. Langston Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Matt Sergeant Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Douglas Otis RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Rand Wacker <= RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Mark Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Matt Sergeant Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, wayne Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, gmc (Deploy) In support of Sender ID, Steven Carbone

Previous by Date:	Re: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Daniel Senie
Next by Date:	RE: PRA Patent: License for Display in MUAs?, william(at)elan.net
Previous by Thread:	RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm
Next by Thread:	RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]