consensus call of RR prefix

From the discussion on prefixes for the DNS record, there seems to have 
been no discernible outcome regarding the use of prefixes for the 
purposes of avoiding collisions with other DNS records (thus avoiding 
fallback to DNS over TCP).
Naturally, this issue wraps itself into both the versioning/scoping 
issue and the wildcard issue.  Based on the comments received so far, 
it is the opinion of the co-chairs that there is no consensus on how to 
handle wildcards and that most participants seem to agree that 
wildcards present a problem no matter the solution.  Based on the 
comments received so far, it is the opinion of the co-chairs that there 
is consensus on placing the "scope" in the RDATA of the record and no 
consensus on the scope being in the prefix.
Therefore, that leaves one under-discussed question: should a prefix be 
used to avoid collision with other records as one measure of preventing 
the requirement of DNS over TCP?
Incidentally, the co-chairs note that many examples of the prefix have 
used "-marid".  We would note that "MARID" is the name of this working 
group and likely not meaningful beyond the context of discussions and 
process of this working group.  Therefore we recommend a more 
meaningful label such as "_rmx": the deduction of its meaning is easier 
and it references the genesis of the MARID idea.
-your co-chairs