ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: consensus call of RR prefix

2004-09-04 10:41:26


I wrote:

    Roy> I concur.  Purely pragmatically, many people will want to
    Roy> check both SPF and IETF-compliant Sender ID.  Being able to
    Roy> fetch both with a single query is therefore beneficial.

I replied without thinking it through; compliant implementations will
check SPF2 first, so the gain I was envisaging does not exist.  In
fact, there's a loss in that you potentially fetch the Sender ID data
twice, once in the SPF2 lookup, and once in the TXT lookup needed for
SPF checks.

However, I'm against using a prefix with SPF2 records.  It would be
pointless as an attempt to avoid a clash with other uses of SPF2
records, and as others have said, wildcards are unlikely to be useful
in either case...

I'm neutral as to whether TXT records should have a prefix, but it's
probably simpler to put SPF2 records and TXT records at the same
place.

        -roy