Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope


Another thing: the macro language should have a letter for interpolating
the scope.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
SOUTH UTSIRE: VARIABLE 3 OR 4. MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Tony Finch Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Chris Haynes Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Mark C. Langston Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Matt Sergeant Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Guillaume Filion Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Yakov Shafranovich Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, David Woodhouse Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Yakov Shafranovich Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Tony Finch <= Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Matt Sergeant Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, william(at)elan.net Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, william(at)elan.net Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, wayne Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Tony Finch