Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope



On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:06 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:

A HELO scope would be useful.


That is already being covered by the CSV proposals.

-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Tony Finch Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Chris Haynes Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Mark C. Langston Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Matt Sergeant Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Guillaume Filion Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Yakov Shafranovich Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, David Woodhouse Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Yakov Shafranovich Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Tony Finch Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton <= Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Matt Sergeant Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, william(at)elan.net Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Andrew Newton Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, william(at)elan.net Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, wayne Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Tony Finch Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope, Dave Crocker