-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of wayne
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:18 PM
To: IETF MARID WG
Subject: Re: Interpreting "v=spf1"
In <CC3A855E-069E-11D9-B753-000393A56BB6(_at_)glyphic(_dot_)com> Mark
Lentczner <markl(_at_)glyphic(_dot_)com> writes:
I am against them being included as part of the standard.
[....]
I am for implementations supporting them.
<snip>
How fricken hard it is it put a sentence in the standard that says:
"Records that begin with v=spf1 MUST be interpreted as
spf2.0/mailfrom,helo"
-wayne
Given the thought:
I am for implementations supporting them.
I see no other choice but then to agree with Wayne v=spf1 ===
spf2.0/mailfrom,helo
Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Fax: (416) 441-9085