On Sep 14, 2004, at 9:59 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:17:51PM -0500, wayne wrote:
|
| "Records that begin with v=spf1 MUST be interpreted as
spf2.0/mailfrom,helo"
|
I agree with the sentiment behind this suggestion. It might
even be more useful if v=spf1 records were defined to mean
spf2.0/pra,mailfrom,helo,pra
or perhaps
spf2.0/pra,mailfrom,helo,pra,ptr
and if a sender is uncomfortable with those semantics then
they should publish proper spf2.0 records that override the
v1 entries.
No. If the standard supports spf1 then spf1 must mean *exactly* what it
means today. Otherwise you are just introducing chaos.
Margaret.