Re: What this WG is doing1997-10-29 06:04:23* Ian Grigg wrote: In the current understanding of the community, the only plausible alternative is to simply omit all mention of the CMRK subpacket from the standard. No. It is possible to document is and point out the security consequences in chapter 'Security Considerations'. It is only undefined, who edit the draft to move forward.
|
|