-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Rodney Thayer wrote:
From: lutz(_at_)taranis(_dot_)iks-jena(_dot_)de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
IMHO: We can't document features or bugs made by a company while we are
working on the draft. We can't document bugs as features. Several
implementation flaws of PGP 5.x must be cleared in this draft.
Exactly what flaws of PGP 5.x that manifest themselves as aspects of the
message format are you referring to?
Anything to do with CMR. This issue is well documented elsewhere,
elsetime, so I won't repeat it here (let me know if I should summarise).
The main manifestation of this that I know of is the addition of a CMRK
subpacket in the signature packet.
Others may have other feature/bug/flaw sets in mind.
- --
iang systemics.com
FP: 1189 4417 F202 5DBD 5DF3 4FCD 3685 FDDE on pgp.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Cryptix 2.21
iQCVAgUANFX+CpUdDk1bRs+FAQG7kgP/dII353mAO3MKcxe9s0YmPV9LgBilCx9B
StSc4ieHEWL9iCMTZGbxllHN6/fSwtw9o4+0bAjZ3Y+/u3J0Ni5JgDJbwcnjLvK9
4W8N+CSP2zZRw/63KaB4OIg8fduj3VC79M0sIkUkRHZjcQ7PT9E8m2X9Txs/Ido4
SjzJhqhjuHQ=
=r4ez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----