Re: What this WG is doing

* Adam Back wrote:
> > The main manifestation of this that I know of is the addition of a
> > CMRK subpacket in the signature packet.
> If this goes in, everyone will be arguing for their favourite
> extension of the day to go in, and there will be a messy political
> argument, so lets please get this draft out without further argument.
Current proposal includes it to avoid usage. This is required to deal
correctly with the already existing extension.