-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)3(_dot_)96(_dot_)980319202340(_dot_)193C-100000(_at_)nescio(_dot_)foebud(_dot_)org>,
on 03/19/98
at 08:25 PM, christopher(_at_)nescio(_dot_)foebud(_dot_)org (Christopher
Creutzig) said:
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Jack Repenning wrote:
-> to") the key owner doing so. The end goal is (I think) the ability to
-> express the meaning of your signature ... "I certify this key for
business -> purposes, but I wouldn't trust this blighter with the
personal secrets of a -> snail."
I think the comment packet would be OK for this, it would just need to
be allowed in signatures in general, not just self-signatures. IMHO that
would be a good thing[tm]. Of course, user interfaces would need to
clearly state that this is *not* a comment the key owner set.
No, I don't like it I don't like it at all. All a signature on a UserID is
to represent is authentication of ownership. I do *not* want my keys
cluttered up with a bunch of meaningless comments from 3rd parties.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/esecure.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: OS/2: Bill Gates' worst nightmare!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNRGM449Co1n+aLhhAQFe0AQAy7+aC6ABYbGz9wCwjII9PBLWcA6sVm/A
Rwq3q6NiKPOBug6NSHXDW8SX8nFuF5EnCvV7yq2lYfgf6PeqSjqztRq2KmCu7mRc
hICStPx3TCMJdWETJbn5vdxCZFAVodntscSoMIU17X3OoQRa81yraOQI72S4kKEE
bZ4binb9AjM=
=Dptr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----