-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -----Original Message-----
From: William H. Geiger III [SMTP:whgiii(_at_)invweb(_dot_)net]
.......
Is it only me who thinks a signature packet should be a signature
and not
a document, certificate, or whatever with signature?
I was just thinking the same thing myself.
Just think about those annoying s-mime sigs that are several times
the
size of the message they are signing due to a bunch of irrelevant
garbage
being stuffed into them.
.....
[M Sovan H - Rel&Sec]
I think it makes a sense if the signature packet should be a
signature, so
it wouldn't grow up infinitly, but then...
... I'm thinking how to authorize the signature packet itself if it
is not signed.
Tell me if I'm wrong...
(Im sorry if what I present here has been dropped before,
Im new comer in this mailing list, so I didn't follow entire
discussion that has
been done).
opang(_at_)risti(_dot_)telkom(_dot_)co(_dot_)id : 62-22-214551 ext 516
PGP Fingerprint: F0AB B2B5 06B3 9DAD 2E77 0E4A B9CC 1912 C31E 8152
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNW3OjrnMGRLDHoFSEQIyuACgzBf2uRpUg8zQLs6jhr3bd9vb13wAn3Ft
hVdf+Vj1jd1b0vd8s7aSnM9+
=Cuy7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----